Scoping Review Proposal Assignment

Assignment Task 

Extenuating circumstances

Ensure you are familiar with the process for submitting a claim for extenuating circumstances. If you experience any extenuating circumstances that may have affected your ability to attempt or submit the present assignment, please follow the relevant instructions on the VLE in order to submit your claim for extenuating circumstance prior to your submission deadline.

Academic misconduct including plagiarism

Ensure that you are familiar with the relevant regulations regarding academic misconduct. By submitting the present assignment, you declare that it is your own work and that the material and sources of information used, including internet sources, have been fully identified and properly acknowledged. In addition, you confirm that the presented work has not been submitted for any other assessment. You also acknowledge that the faculty reserves the right to investigate allegations of plagiarism and other forms of academic misconduct which, if proven and dependent on the severity level of the offence, will result in a penalty that may affect your progress.

General Guidance

Your assignment should be word processed (handwritten assignments are not accepted), using time new roman size 12 font, double spaced, with numbered pages and your student number printed as a footer on every page. The word limits stated for this assignment excludes the reference list at the end of the assignment but includes all text in the main body of the assignment (including direct quotations, in-text citations, footnotes, tables, diagrams and graphs). Please be aware that exceeding the word count limit will affect the academic judgement of the piece of work and may result in the award of a lower mark. Appendices are not considered a supplement, and thus, will not be assessed as part of the content of the assignment. As such, they will not contribute to the grade awarded, however it may be appropriate to use an Appendices section for any material which is a useful reference for the reader. Please note that appendices are not included in the word count. The majority of references should come from primary sources (e.g., journal articles, conference papers, reports, etc.) although you can also utilise area specific textbooks. You must ensure that you use the Liverpool John Moores’ University Harvard style of referencing. Please indicate the word count length at the end of your assignment

Assessment Guidelines

In preparation for undertaking your Dissertation Project, you are required to write a research proposal for a scoping review. The proposal can be based on any public health issue of your choice. A scoping review is a form of evidence synthesis that addresses an exploratory research question aimed at mapping key concepts, types of evidence, and gaps in research related to a defined area or field by systematically searching, selecting, and synthesizing existing knowledge. Your work should include and cover the following sections/aspects and content (as shown and stated in the table below). The specific percentage marks allocated to each section/aspect of your work is stated below. Please also note that the Level 7 marking criteria (located towards the end of this assessment brief) will also be used to reflect this overall grade. Please remember that achievement and demonstration of both learning outcomes 2,3,4,6 and 7 is being assessed in this assessment.

1. Title, Introduction, Aims and Objectives, Review Question

• Clear purpose for undertaking a scoping review on the research

• Identifies major themes, gaps and controversies within the research
• Evidences that scoping searches have been conducted and used in determining the research
• Clearly and precisely identifies research questions to be addressed in a scoping review, relevant to the topic.

2. Inclusion & Exclusion Criteria and Search Strategy

• Inclusion and exclusion criteria are framed using an appropriate
• Clear specification and justification for proposed inclusion and exclusion criteria to select studies for
• A preliminary search strategy
• Shows understanding of concepts and techniques for planning and conducting a systematic literature
• Describes a process for study selection and for how decisions on study selection will be made, including quality assurance processes

3. Charting the data

• Identifies a process for charting the
• Information that will be charted from studies is described in sufficient detail, all variables for which data will be sought are listed and defined.
• Quality assurance processes are identified.

4. Data Analysis & Synthesis Methods

• Strategy for data analysis and synthesis is specified and
• Appropriate methods selected for topic, scoping review approach and research
• Demonstrate understanding of concepts and techniques for data synthesis consistent with a scoping review approach.

5. Timeframe

• Suitable project milestones
• Timeframe clearly presented and
• Timeframe demonstrates an understanding of how to plan for and manage a review

6. Presentation / Feasibility

• Scoping review is
• Clarity, conciseness, logical
• Correct and accurate referencing format.

This Medical Science have been solved by our PhD Experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient in providing a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, the UK, and the US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well-trained to follow all marking rubrics and referencing styles.
Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.