SITXHRM010 - Recruit Select and Induct Staff

Assessment instructions to Learner

Overview 

Prior to commencing the assessments, your trainer/assessor will explain each assessment task and the terms and conditions relating to the submission of your assessment task. Please consult with your trainer/assessor if you are unsure of any questions. It is important that you understand and adhere to the terms and conditions, and address fully each assessment task.

Written work

Assessment tasks are used to measure your understanding and underpinning skills and knowledge of the overall unit of competency. When undertaking any written assessment tasks, please ensure that you address the following criteria: 

• Address each question including any sub-points 
• Demonstrate that you have researched the topic thoroughly
• Cover the topic in a logical, structured manner
• Your assessment tasks are well presented, well referenced and word processed 

Active participation

It is a condition of enrolment that you actively participate in your studies. Active participation is completing all the assessment tasks on time.

Plagiarism

Plagiarism is taking and using someone else's thoughts, writings or inventions and representing them as your own. Plagiarism is a serious act and may result in a learner’s exclusion from a course. When you have any doubts about including the work of other authors in your assessment, please consult your trainer/assessor. The following list outlines some of the activities for which a learner can be accused of plagiarism:

• Presenting any work by another individual as one's own unintentionally
• Handing in assessments markedly like or copied from another learner 
• Presenting the work of another individual or group as their own work 
• Handing in assessments without the adequate acknowledgement of sources used, including
• assessments taken totally or in part from the internet. 

If it is identified that you have plagiarised within your assessment, then a meeting will be organised to discuss this with you, and further action may be taken accordingly. 

Collusion

Collusion is the presentation by a learner of an assignment as their own that is, in fact, the result in whole or in part of unauthorised collaboration with another person or persons. Collusion involves the cooperation of two or more learners in plagiarism or other forms of academic misconduct and, as such, both parties are subject to disciplinary action.

Competency outcome

There are two outcomes of assessments: S = Satisfactory and NS = Not Satisfactory (requires more training and experience). 

Once the learner has completed all the assessments for this unit of competency, the learner will be awarded “Competent” (C) or “Not Competent” (NC) for the relevant unit of competency.

Confidentiality

The college will treat anything, including information about your job, workplace, employer, with strict confidence, in accordance with the law. However, you are responsible for ensuring that you do not provide us with anything regarding any third party including your employer, colleagues, and others, that they do not consent to the disclosure of. While we may ask you to provide information or details about aspects of your employer and workplace, you are responsible for obtaining necessary consents and ensuring that privacy rights and confidentiality obligations are not breached by you in supplying us with such information. 

Assessment appeals process

If you feel that you have been unfairly treated during your assessment, and you are not happy with your assessment and/or the outcome because of that treatment, you have the right to lodge an appeal. You must first discuss the issue with your trainer/assessor. If you would like to proceed further with the request after discussions with your trainer/assessor, you need to lodge your appeal via the complaint and appeal form which is available on the college website.

Recognised prior learning

Learners will be able to have their previous experience or expertise recognised on request. 

Special needs

Learners with special needs should notify their trainer/assessor to request any required adjustments as soon as possible. This will enable the trainer/assessor to address the identified needs immediately .

Based on the provided text, the assessment requires students to demonstrate their understanding of a unit of competency through written work. Key requirements include answering all questions, researching topics thoroughly, presenting information logically and in a well-referenced manner, and submitting word-processed work on time. The assessment also strictly prohibits plagiarism and collusion and outlines the consequences. The grading is pass/fail, with outcomes of "Satisfactory" or "Not Satisfactory." The document also covers important administrative points like confidentiality, the appeals process, recognition of prior learning, and special needs accommodations.

The Academic Mentor's Approach to the Assessment

The academic mentor's approach to guiding the student through this assessment would be a structured, step-by-step process to ensure all requirements were met, and the student understood the learning objectives. The mentor's guidance would break down the complex requirements into manageable tasks, focusing on a logical progression from understanding the brief to the final submission.

Phase 1: Understanding the Assessment Brief

The mentor's first step would be to review the assessment instructions with the student. This involves a detailed discussion of the "Assessment Instructions to Learner" document. The mentor would clarify the purpose of the assessment, which is to measure the student's underpinning skills and knowledge of the unit of competency. They'd cover the following key points:

• Written Work: The mentor would emphasize the need to answer every question and sub-point, stress the importance of thorough research , and guide the student on how to structure their work logically. They'd also ensure the student understands the formatting requirements (well-presented, well-referenced, and word-processed).

• Academic Integrity: This is a crucial section. The mentor would hold a direct conversation about the definitions of plagiarism and collusion, providing real-world examples to help the student understand what constitutes academic misconduct. They would explain the serious consequences and teach the student how to properly cite sources to avoid unintentional plagiarism.

• Administrative Details: The mentor would briefly explain the grading system (Satisfactory/Not Satisfactory), confidentiality policies, and the process for appeals. They would also encourage the student to disclose any special needs early on so that accommodations can be made.

Phase 2: Execution and Guidance

Once the student understands the requirements, the mentor would guide them through the actual creation of the assessment. This phase is about practical application and hands-on support.

• Step-by-Step Task Breakdown: The mentor would help the student break down the assessment into smaller, manageable tasks. For example, "First, focus on researching question one," followed by, "Next, create an outline for your answer." This approach prevents the student from feeling overwhelmed.

• Research and Sourcing: The mentor would work with the student to identify credible sources of information, such as academic journals, books, and reputable online resources. They would provide guidance on effective research techniques and teach the student how to take detailed notes to support their work.

• Drafting and Structuring: The mentor would review the student's initial drafts, offering feedback on the logical flow and structure. They would ensure that the student is directly addressing each question and that their arguments are well-supported by their research. They'd also provide feedback on sentence structure and clarity to improve the overall quality of the writing.

Final Outcome and Learning Objectives

The final outcome of this process is a well-researched, properly structured, and accurately referenced assessment that meets all the specified requirements. The student's work would be a direct reflection of the guidance provided by the academic mentor, demonstrating their mastery of the subject matter while adhering to the college's academic standards

Learning Objectives Covered:

The mentor's guidance directly covers several key learning objectives beyond the subject matter itself:

• Information Literacy: The student learns how to conduct thorough research, evaluate sources, and synthesize information effectively.

• Academic Integrity: The student gains a deep understanding of plagiarism and collusion and learns the practical skills of proper referencing and citation to maintain academic honesty.

• Time Management and Planning: By breaking down the assessment, the student learns how to manage a long-term project and meet deadlines.

• Critical Thinking and Writing Skills: The student improves their ability to structure a logical argument, express complex ideas clearly, and present their work in a professional and well-organized manner.

• Self-Advocacy: The student learns the importance of communicating with their instructor about any challenges or special needs, as outlined in the assessment brief.

Need More Than a Sample? Get Your Custom Solution!

This sample solution is a great reference for understanding the structure and quality of a top-notch academic paper. But remember, it's for learning purposes only. Submitting this work as your own is a serious academic offense and could lead to severe consequences for plagiarism.

The best way to guarantee a high grade and avoid any risk is with a custom-written solution. Our team of professional academic writers can craft a 100% original, plagiarism-free assignment tailored to your specific requirements. You'll get a unique, well-researched, and perfectly formatted paper that meets all your instructor's guidelines.

Don't risk your academic future with copy-pasted work. Invest in a fresh, custom solution and turn in your assignment with confidence.

Download Sample Solution

Order Fresh Assignment