Sociology - A Feminist Socially Acceptable In Modern Western Culture - Essay Writing Assessment Answer

Download Solution Order New Solution
Internal Code: 1AIDBF

Sociology - Modern Western Culture - Essay Writing Assessment Answer

Assignment Task: QUESTION: To what extent is identifying as a feminist socially acceptable in modern western culture? EXAMPLE OF RESEARCH DESIGN: Using a mixed methods approach of survey and interview – asking people on their experiences of feminism, what it means to them, how often it affects them. Compare these answers to the persons' gender, age, social status etc. EXAMPLES IN ESSAY: clarifying what feminism is, can be different for everyone. extreme feminists, male feminists, popular celebrity culture to identify as feminist. Previous research that shows this. CONCLUSION: Types of people specifically who identify as feminist/those who are opposed and if there are commonalities. Why are we doing this?  Specific educational objectives: Learn how to:
  1. Use feedback on your work to improve its quality
  2. Read and summarize a set of academic articles/books and government reports
  3. Apply course materials to critically review the sources, including methods used
  4. Write an integrated literature review – see the forest from the trees
  5. Formulate a persuasive claim on knowledge gap and a tight research question
  6. Properly structure an academic essay (introduction, conclusion, transitions,    referencing, style)
Why do we need to know this?  1. To succeed in the upper division social science/ humanities courses, you will need to write good literature review papers  2.  To get a job that is related to your education and to advance in that e above quesiotnjob, you will need good analytical abilities, good writing skills, and ability to synthesize literature (important for lawyers, social workers, policy analysts, police investigators, NGO organizers, journalists)  What exactly are you supposed to produce?    Required file format:   Microsoft Word (available at Bar Smith Library desktops)  Length:
  •  Cover page
  •  1 page, with your full name, student number and date of submission
  •  the cover page needs to be the first page of the single file you are submitting
  •  Main text  
  •  10 pages, double-spaced, 12 pt size Times New Roman
  •  2.54 cm margins on all sides
  •  References
  •  1-2 pages, double-spaced, 12 pt size Times New Roman
  •  2.54 cm margins on all sides
Structure  
  • Introduction (1-2 paragraphs )  
  • topic
  • clear identification as to what you are doing
  • the topic clearly sociological or social work-related
  • not philosophical, not religious, not about ethics
  • Researchable question
  • a theoretically important question ( based on the knowledge gap)
  • that you can answer with a feasible study
  • clear terminology- any specialized terms used are well defined
  • clear question (not 5 lines long)
  • question is not trivial :
  • intelligent people could disagree on what is the correct response
  • focus is explanatory, not descriptive
  • focus on "Why?" not on "What?"
  • why did something happen?
  • the clear reference to time and space
  1. the pattern of development of the paper (new element- the paper logically builds towards your proposed study Body of the paper (7-8 pages)
  • how NOT to do it:
  • do not simply copy and paste summaries of everything
  • how to do it
  • group the readings on the basis of, Download the solution from our nursing assessment expert.
  1. Theory they support
  2. Main findings
  3. Methods used
 Critical Analysis of readings (NEW!)
  • pay special attention to problems in methods
  • avoid bias
  • you know what you would like to find out and then ignore and dismiss the evidence to the contrary
  • be open to adjusting your own beliefs, as opposed to just searching for a confirmation
  • you need to discuss – fairly and respectfully  – studies that disagree with you
  • Bad: “Some dumb people who disagree with me (Jones  2003:105; Smith 2017:52) have argued ....”
1) Literature Search a) What will George look for?
  • sources used clearly meet the expectations (see page 4 above)
  • quality and relevance of the sources for the topic and research question
2) Critical Analysis a) What will George look for?  
  • balanced use and integration of all sources: noticing forest from the trees
 
    • key terms used need to be briefly defined
 
  • good presentation of the main findings
 
  • such as: place, year, sample, data collection, etc
   
    • correct use of terminology
 
  • debate clearly explained
 
  • methodological analysis: correct application of the relevant course materials to develop methodological criticism(operationalization, definition, validity, reliability, sampling, scope; validity: internal, external, ecological)
 
  • assess the credibility of the findings reported
  • both strengths and weaknesses of the sources discussed
     
  1. b) Potential Problems  
 
  • completely forgetting to do methodological analysis
 
  • you should seek to find the best answer on the question, not to prove a hypothesis
 
  • avoid over-reliance on a single source
      3) Knowledge Gap and Proposed Study a) What will George look for?e above quesiotn  
  • knowledge gap clearly identified
 
  • originality of the contribution is clear – you are not reinventing the wheel
 
  • how what you are proposing to do is adding to what is already known
  • here is what they did not do and how I will fix that
     
  1. b) Potential Problems
 
  • forgetting to mention and to clearly explain the knowledge gap
 
  • forgetting to briefly outline the proposed study
 
  • the proposed study makes no sense (feasibility, ethics, etc)
  • forgot to respond to the feedback on A1 by implementing some of the suggestions for improvement
      4) Research Question a) What will George look for?
    • a clear formulation of an explanatory research question
 
  • you hint at your own contribution while analyzing sources
  b) Potential Problems    
  • forgetting to fix problems with the research question identified in the Prospectus
 
    • a research question is descriptive, instead of explanatory
 
  • research question needs to lead towards your proposed study
  5) Writing a) What will George look for?  
  • intro (topic, research question, a pattern of development)
 
  • conclusion (summary)
   
  • good word choice
  • good use of jargon
  • good style
  • not repetitive or redundant
  • not too long or too short a paragraph
  • stayed within the page limit
  1. b) Potential Problems  
    • forgot to spell check (especially common mistake in end of text referencing)
    • problems with sentence construction: not grammatical, very long, unfocused
 
  • super-long quotations
 
    • lack of clarity “this”/”that”/ “it”
 
  • intro: forgetting to have a sentence on the pattern of development
 
  • large chunks of the text unrelated to the research question
    a) What will George look for?
  • all empirically testable claims are referenced
  • proper in-text referencing (including last name, year of publication, page numbers)
  • proper bibliography attached
b) Potential Problems  
  • if a source is listed under References it has to be referenced in the main text
 
  • avoid wordy ways to address studies (full title, names of authors)
   
  • in text referencing ignores instructions sheet
    • remember to use page numbers in in-text references
  • empirical statements have to be followed by in-text references that back them up
    • to answer “How do you know that?” question
  • bibliography
    • please alphabetize
How do I do this? Read these Expectations Sheet Review two model assignments posted at MyUni Read and summarize sources
  • - read by a hierarchy of importance
  • - type single study reviews (as you did for the source in assignment two)
  • - what is their thesis?
  • - what is she or he arguing for/against?
  • - what is their main argument?
  • - how convincing is their evidence?
  • - how is all of this relevant for your project?
  • - what are the methods used and their possible limitations?
  • - similar work to what you did for the second assignment
  • - NOT just the findings
  • - quality of the method?
  • - study design, sampling, data collection, data analysis used?
  • - build your Ideas / Analysis file
  • - how are different authors participating in the debate on the topic?
  • - notice how they fit together
  • - what they agree on?
Review relevant lecture notes and textbook chapters
  1. - these materials should help you to
  2. - develop methodological criticisms of existing works- come up with the ideas for your proposed research
Design Paper Structure
  • - do NOT plan to just copy and paste summaries
  • - do NOT over-rely on a single source or a couple of sources
  • - need to see the forest from the trees (use Tips on Assignment 3 Sheet at MyUni)
  • - group authors on the basis of
  • - theories used
  • - methods used
  • - main findings
  • - what is the knowledge gap?
  • - the point of disagreement among the authors?
  • - unexplored issues?
  • - what methods will you propose at the end to find the answer on the question?
Fix Paper Structure
  • - organize the summaries and ideas
  • - think of the best order of sub-topics,
  • - how will you connect different topics
  • - how will everything logically lead to your proposal?
  • - sales pitch element
This Essay Writing Assessment has been solved by our Essay Writing experts at onlineassignmentbank. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.

Get It Done! Today

Country
Applicable Time Zone is AEST [Sydney, NSW] (GMT+11)
+

Every Assignment. Every Solution. Instantly. Deadline Ahead? Grab Your Sample Now.