Spatial Theory and Inhabitation Typology - Case Study - Engineering Assignment Help

Assignment Task

Design Studio Overview – 86005 (20%) Assessment 3 Theme: Understanding Theories And Typologies Of Space Key Skills And Ideas:

Research methods, interior analysis, presentation techniques. 
SUMMARY:

The aim of this assessment is to develop core skills in interior research and analysis. Students will produce a short report for an interior case study of their choosing to develop an understanding of the relationship between types of inhabitation, space planning and social values. 
MAJOR MILESTONES:

Assessment 3 (Friday 9 am - Assessment week 1): understanding theories and typologies of space (20%). 
ASSESSMENT BREAKDOWN:

Spatial Theory and Inhabitation Typology - Case Study Report Portrait A4 report submitted as a .PDF digital submission via Turn-it-in. This report must include the following information: 
Report structure Section 1 – Typology Identification Photograph a domestic interior case study of your choosing that you know well and are able to have complete access to. 
• Identify which of the following type of inhabitation typology it is: 
- Terrace house,

- Single family house,

- Self-contained housing unit

- Post-modern box 
• Photograph a minimum of three of its characteristics that identify it as one of the above typologies. Provide a short (max. 25 word) statement for each photograph. 
• Through research, identify the specific style of your case study. Photography a minimum of three characteristics that Identify your case study as this specific style, and provide a short (max. 25 word) statement for each photograph. Some common style examples include: Victorian Terrace, Georgian Terrace, Edwardian Terrace, California Bungalow (or another style of bungalow), Federation house, Sydney School house, Art Deco Apartment, Modern Apartment, International Style Apartment, Brutalist Apartment, Post-Modern Apartment. Please identify if your case study is one of these or if it is another style that is not listed, based on your research. 
Section 2 – Typology Examination Draw a plan of your case study and compare it with the plan provided for the same inhabitation typology (below). 
• Compare the two plans using parti diagrams and text to demonstrate how your case study is different from the one provided (below) for each of the following characteristics: 
- Types of spaces provided – in your plan, what spaces are new, what spaces have been left out, what 
spaces have been hybridised, what spaces have changed size? (2 parti diagrams with max. 50 word statement) - internal arrangement of spaces – in your plan, what spaces relate to each other and how do they relate to each other (for example: completely open, closable doors, etc.)? Are the internal arrangements of your case study different to the plan provided (below) and if so how? (2 parti diagrams with max. 50 word statement) - external arrangement of spaces - in your plan, what interior spaces relate to the exterior (such as: living 
rooms to streets, etc.), how do the interior spaces relate to the exterior (for example: windows, doors, porches, balconies etc.)? Are the relationships to the exterior in your case study different to the plan provided (below) and if so how? (2 parti diagrams with max. 50 word statement). 
Section 3 – Typology Speculation Based on your knowledge of the inhabitation typologies provided, speculate on the change in social values that have caused the change in the space planning arrangement of your case study, for each of the following values: 
• Privacy – how has privacy (the placement and size of bedrooms and other private spaces) changed from the inhabitation typology provided (below), compared to your case study? Why do you think it has changed? (max. 150 words) 
• Social status – how has social status (the placement and size of living spaces and other public spaces) changed from the inhabitation typology provided (below), compared to your case study? Why do you think it has changed? (max. 150 words) 
• Efficiency – how has efficiency (the placement and size of kitchens) changed from the inhabitation typology provided (below), compared to your case study? Why do you think it has changed? (max. 150 words) 
• New social values – Outline what new social values—other than those listed above—may now affect the placement and size of new spaces in your case study (max. 300 words). 
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS: 
Portrait A4 report, including a cover page with your name, student number, studio leaders name and word count, uploaded as a .PDF file to Turn-it-in. 
All references MUST use APA referencing conventions. 

Typology: Single family house

Typology: Terrace

Typology: All 
• Caroline Simpson Library and Research Collection 
• Hill, Jonathan. Immaterial architecture. New York: Routledge, 2006. (Ch. 1) 
• Stapleton, Maisy, and Ian Stapleton. Australian House Styles. Mullumbimby: The Flannel Flower Press Pty Ltd, 2003. 
 

This Engineering Assignment has been solved by our Engineering Experts at onlineassignmentbank. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.

Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.