State Government - Stakeholder Theory - Economic Distribution Theories - Independently - Business Assessment Answer

State Government - Stakeholder Theory - Economic Distribution Theories - Independently - Business Assessment Answer

Assessment Task:

The question to answer is the following:

AAre Adani and the State Government ethically right or wrong in the Wangan and Jagalingounative title case?

• Use stakeholder theory (chapter 3, Lecture 4) and address issues of Diversity and inclusion specifically in relation to Native Title owners.
•  Provide arguments based on a “sufficient number” of theories of Corporate Governance, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), Creating Shared Value (CSV) and any other sustainability theory to justify or criticize the actions taken by Adani and the state government in relation to this case.
• Analyze these decisions and actions using normative theories of ethics as well as justice and economic distribution theories.

A GROUP of traditional owners opposed to the Adani mine have left the door open to take their fight over the native title to the nation’s highest court. Yesterday, the full bench of the Federal Court rejected the Wangan and Jagalingou people’s bid to overturn the Adani Indigenous Land Use Agreement (ILUA) between the miner and the State Government, which permanently extinguished the rights of the traditional owners.Colin Hardie, lawyer for the five members of the group, including activist Adrian Burragubba, told The Courier-Mail they were yet to decide whether there were grounds to appeal. The ruling confirmed the single-judge decision handed down in the Federal Court last year, where Justice John Reeves found the challengers’ arguments had no merit.The group, including Delia Kemppi, Burragubba and three others, claimed in their appeal the ILUA was not valid because Adani had paid money to those recruiting Aboriginal people to attend meetings where traditional owners would decide on the crucial mining deal.The traditional owners argued there were 200 people who attended the meeting to vote on the mine who had not pre-registered or were not known by elders at the meeting. They also said some who voted on the mine were not verified as native title holders. In their appeal, they challenged two steps leading to the registration of the AdaniILUA.The group claimed Justice Reeves did not correctly interpret the Native Title Act and Adani’s ILUA did not provide a “complete description” of the area of land in which native title would be surrendered.

This Business Assessment has been solved by our Business experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.

Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.