Strategy Exploration - HRM Financials - SWOT Analysis - Report Writing - Management Assignment Help

Assignment Task:

Task:

This assignment focuses on a company or organisation of your choice. This could be your current employer, a past employer or an organisation you are interested in. You cannot use one of the organisations of the group assignment. The assignment consists of 3 parts and a final paper where all of the information gathered and learned will come together.

 PART 1 Strategy exploration

 Make a choice between the four presented strategy models (Harvard, Michigan, Six components and Sustainable HRM) to use for this assignment and provide arguments why this is the appropriate model. Make an analysis of your organisation using this model.

 Identify three strategic business goals and link these with the relevant strategic HR goals. If your organisation does not have any HR goals, please formulate (clearly indicated) goals yourself.
 

 PART  2 HRM Financials
 Identify at least five key HR metrics for your organisation and benchmark them to relevant organisations. Give an educated guess of the cost to the organisation of each metric.
 Write a brief summary of your conclusions, taking into account the outcomes of your strategy exploration.
 

PART  3 SWOT analysis
 Use the information you have gathered in the first two assignments to create a SWOT analysis of HR practices in your organisation. Each section should contain at least five items. In-depth analysis: Final paper (30%)

In your final paper you will provide an in-depth analysis, based on your SWOT, of three components of the HR cycle (your choice): selection, performance management, development, appreciation and rewards, and their underlying, or supporting, OB theories and models. You will make use of the information gathered in the previous assignments and by using the following theories for each component:

  Selection: Career dynamics (Schein)
 Performance Management: AMO theory (Appelbaum)
 Development: Organisational learning (Argyris)
 Appreciation: Taxonomy for leadership (Yuckl)
 Rewards: Two-factor theory (Herzberg)

 As an example: if you decide to use a strength of your organisation in selecting the right employee, you will analyse this further using career dynamics theory, and support your analysis with at least one OB theory or concept made explicit (for example: person-organisation/job fit). If you pick an opportunity for your organisation if it comes to rewards, you will use two-factor theory to elaborate further, and add support from for example motivation,  or personality theories, or concepts of job satisfaction, or employee commitment.

 Next to that, for one of the two remaining components you will provide a critical evaluation of one recent scholarly Organisational Behaviour article (peer reviewed). The article chosen needs to be approved by the lecturers. So, as an example, if you have chosen selection, appreciation and rewards for your in-depth analysis, the scholarly OB article should be about either performance management or development.
 Your paper should be concluded with at least five recommendations for your organisation to improve the Human Experience.

Critical evaluation of 1 recent scholarly OB article: 30% (min 2, max 4 A4 =1500-2000 words)

Your article is recent (not older than 2015), peer reviewed, and contains a research component. 
The article chosen needs to be approved by the lecturers. 
Where to start looking for a peer reviewed OB research article? Some suggestions:
Make use of your textbook! At the end of each chapter you will find the references
cited in the text. They may lead you to an article of interest, or a relevant journal to
look at.
Amongst others, the following publications, most of which are available in the
THUAS library online:
Academy of Management Journal
Academy of Management Review 
Administrative Science Quarterly
Human Relations
Journal of Applied Psychology
Journal of Management
Journal of Organizational Behavior
Leadership Quarterly
Organizational Dynamics

Components of the Critical Review:
 Short summary of article, explaining the main idea(s)
 Theories & sources: What relationship does it bear to other works & theories in the field? Make sure to cite at least 3 sources/theories/models.
 Critical analysis: present the positive and negative features of the article.
 Conclusion: your personal view and opinion of the article, based on the analysis.

How to write a critical review - some resources to get you going!
TIP! Make sure to study the Appendix in our textbook to (re)acquaint yourself with research terminology, and methodology. 
 For a short guide to writing a critical review, see: CritReview.pdf    
 A good example of a (partial) critical review: Sample Extract - critical article review UNSW.pdf    

 An example prepared by Bradford School of Management's tutor Jo McBride with explanations you can see (and hear!) here: https://slideplayer.com/slide/7306305/

 And finally, this video (9 minutes) gives a clear explanation on the elements of a critical review (sometimes called "critique essay") 

 Watch Video

 How to Write a Critique Essay (An Evaluation Essay_
 Duration:9:26
 User:n/a -Added:29/01/13

Personal reflection based on PIA (Personal Inventory Assessment Tests) 10%  (min 1, max 3 A4)
Your completed PIA's (8) form the basis of this reflection paper. As mentioned before, there are more PIAs!
You will find the links to all PIAs here.
These are optional, and you are welcome to take (some of) these and add them to your reflection paper.

After taking the PIA assessments, reflect upon your assessment results (overall and competency results, if applicable).
 What did you learn about yourself?
 What are the implications of your results in terms of your ability to contribute to the success of an organization?
 What strengths did you realize and what are some of the weaknesses you identified?
 How will you improve upon those areas of opportunity in the future?

This Management Assignment has been solved by our Management Experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.

Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment Experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.