STRM059: Demonstrate and Enact the Chief Ethical Considerations that Impact Business Management Research - Management Assignment Help

Assignment Task

Purpose of the Assessment

The purpose of this assignment is to report on an independent piece of research based upon an actual business case situation.

Assessment Task

In the current international economic environment, entrepreneurs and managers are frequently required to undertake business planning, project and consultancy work in addition to their core responsibilities. Frequently, these projects are focused upon investigating new business opportunities or potential strategic changes in order to create, retain and extend competitive position.

The assessment task is to produce a 8500 words (±10%) research project report based on an independent research, which investigates a business/organisational or management problem, issue or challenge, applies appropriate research techniques and analysis, and consequently informs the development of a business plan and/ or results in recommendations for change.

Where the submission exceeds the stipulated word limit by more than 10%, the submission will only be marked up to and including the additional 10%. Anything over this will not be included in the final grade for the assessment item. Abstracts, bibliographies, reference lists, appendices and footnotes are excluded from any word limit requirements.

Where a submission is notably under the word limit, the full submission will be marked on the extent to which the requirements of the assessment brief have been met.

Additional Guidance

Projects should be submitted with the UoN Faculty of Business & Law Ethics Form which has been signed by your project supervisor. The blank Ethics Form, sample Participant Information and Consent Forms/ Templates are available at the end of this assignment brief. Please see NILE for additional guidance about appendices.

Ethics Approval

Your primary research should be undertaken under cover of an authorised Ethics Application that must include all supporting documentation (eg research instrument, participant information sheet, informed consent form). If you do not include your approved Ethics Form in your submission, 10% of your final grade will be deducted. If you do not have Ethics Approval for your research, your submission will be an automatic AG (fail).

Primary Data Sets
All students should be prepared to present their primary data sets to support their submission.
The University and Module Team reserve the right to request access to primary data sets at any time.
SUGGESTED FORMAT FOR THE PROJECT REPORT
TITLE/ COVER PAGE 

The following details should be stated on your title page:

• The title of your project

• Student name and number

• Full Name & affiliation of Supervisor

Your cover page should also include the University Logo and your Faculty of study

ABSTRACT

This is a summary of your report and should not be more than one page. Essentially your Abstract is a summary (NOT an outline) of the different sections of the proposal or report – for example a summary of the research topic describing the project, in terms of some background information, your project aim, your methodology, main outcomes and recommendations from your research.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Thank any people that have assisted/contributed to your project.
TABLE OF CONTENTS

Provide a list of the sections of your project report with page numbers. Provide a list of the figures and tables presented in your project report, if applicable.

SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION

• What is the setting/ context for your research project?

• What is your project about?

• What are the aim and objectives of your research project?

• Describe how your project will assist the organization, if relevant and applicable.

• Describe the consultation process you have undertaken with the organization, if applicable.

SECTION 2: LITERATURE REVIEW

What are the key concepts and theories that provide some background or platform for your research project? Discussing these detail a thorough review of relevant studies related to your research. Make sure you consult a wide range of relevant literature/ studies. Ensure this is a critical review – not just descriptive or an annotated bibliography. All sources should be correctly attributed using the Harvard Referencing format.

SECTION 3: METHODOLOGY

• What methodology did you adopt and why?

• What is the principle or philosophy that guides & shapes your research project and why (example Positivist, interpretivist; inductive/deductive, etc.)?

• Who did you work with and/ or who is your research sample and why?

• What methods did you employ for collecting data and why?

• How did you ensure adequate ethical procedure?

• What is/ are your research question(s)

• What are your hypotheses, if applicable.

• How did you analyse your data (analytical and statistical procedures employed) and why?

SECTION 4: RESULTS/ FINDINGS

• Clear and logical presentation of the findings or results of your research, sighting corresponding examples/ instances from your collected/ generated data

o These might include tables, graphs or other diagrams

• Ensure your results correspond with your stated research objectives/ research questions, or hypotheses (if applicable)

• You might want to consider integrating this section with Section 5 (below) or it can be a standalone Section.

SECTION 5: DISCUSSION AND EVALUATION

• An analytical/ critical discussion of your findings/ results aimed at addressing your research objectives or answering your stated research question(s)/ hypotheses.

o Refer to any diagrams, questionnaire results, graphs, etc. discussed/ presented in the Results/ Findings Chapter

• What are the implications of your findings?

• How do your findings link with existing research?

SECTION 6: CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

• What do your findings show? • What were the limitations of your project?

• What recommendations would you make on the basis of your findings/ results?

• Do you think your recommendations are innovative or entrepreneurial? How and why are they?

SECTION 7: REFERENCES

• Full details of all the sources cited in your report. These should be formatted based on the recommended Harvard Referencing System

GUIDANCE ON APPENDICES

• These should include any material which is of interest, but which is peripheral to the project, e.g. approved ethics form, sample participant information sheet & consent form, tables of results, graphs, photos, raw data from surveys and interviews, etc.

• You should try and keep any such appendices to a minimum.

Academic Practice

This is an individual assignment. The University of Northampton policy will apply in all cases of copying, plagiarism or any other methods by which students have obtained (or attempted to obtain) an unfair advantage.

Support and guidance on assessments and academic integrity can be found from the following resources

• SkillsHub: http://skillshub.northampton.ac.uk

• Learning Development: Access via NILE

If a case of academic misconduct is suspected the tutor will apply a ZZ grade in NILE.

ASSESSMENT SUBMISSION

To submit your work, please go to the ‘Submit your work’ area on the NILE site and use the PJ1- PROJECT REPORT submission point to upload your report. It is important that you submit your work to the correct module NILE site, and that your work is submitted on time. The deadline for this is 11.59pm (UK local time) on the date of submission.

The work will be subject to Turnitin anti-plagiarism detection software. Turnitin checks student work for possible textual matches against internet available resources and its own proprietary database.

N.B Work emailed directly to me will not be marked.
Late submission of work
If your report is submitted late and an extension has not been granted, the following will apply: 

• Within one week of the original deadline – work will be marked and returned with full feedback, and awarded a maximum bare pass grade of C-.

• More than one week from original deadline – maximum grade achievable LG (L indicating late).

If a resit
Any work submitted late will be awarded a LG grade. 

Extensions

The University of Northampton’s general policy with regard to extensions is to be supportive of students who have genuine difficulties, but not against pressures of work that could have reasonably been anticipated. Please refer to Appendix I of the Post Graduate Handbook for advice on extensions.

If a resit
There are NO extensions for resits

Resit Opportunities

If a student fails an assessment, or fails to submit an assessment, at the first opportunity, s/he is entitled to a second submission (resit) opportunity, although there are exceptions that are detailed in the Academic Regulations. At that resit opportunity, the maximum grade achievable is a bare pass (C-).

Feedback and Grades
Your grade and overall summary feedback will be available in Grade Centre.
Mitigating Circumstances

For guidance on Mitigating circumstances please go to https://www.northampton.ac.uk/about-us/governance-andmanagement/universitypolicies-procedures-and-regulations/ where under Student Issues you will find detailed guidance on the policy as well as guidance and the form for making an application.

Please note, however, that an application to defer an assessment on the grounds of mitigating circumstances should normally be made in advance of the submission deadline or examination date.

LEARNING OUTCOMES
On successful completion of the module, participants will be able to:
Knowledge and Understanding

a) critically assess and apply theoretical concepts, constructs and models required to analyse business case problems, plans and issues.

b) critically explore, employ and implement varying philosophical contexts and methodological approaches in the planning and execution of a range of management and business case problems and issues.

c) demonstrate and enact the chief ethical considerations that impact business management research.

Subject Specific Skills

d) source, identify and critically review primary and secondary data material.

e) learn to define and express succint & measureable targets, within a business and organisational context.

f) effectively utilise approriate tools and analytical/ statistical procedures to analyse and interpret quantitative and qualitative data.

Key Skills

g) develop and demonstrate the ability to work independently, timely and to manage the entire research process from question formulation through to analyses, interpretation and implication of results.

h) develop and demonstrate an appropriate report writing style that balances the demands of brevity, comprehension and criticality, and is approriate for both academic submission and for corporate requirements.

i) develop communication & dissemination skills in both written and oral forms including defence strategies and summarising skills.

Assessment Breakdown

 

This Management Assignment has been solved by our Management Experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.

Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.