Study on the Vacant Land for Highest and Best Use - Economics Assignment Help

Assignment Task

Study on the Vacant Land for Highest and Best Use

The real estate slogan has always been "location, location, location." While location is essential, considerable value can be lost if a location is not matched with the optimum use of that place. For example, if a high-rise office building were erected on the lot beneath a three-story walkup apartment building in midtown Manhattan, the lot would be considerably more desirable. In a rural region with a tiny population, a corn field may be more valuable than a huge retail shopping complex.

In this post, we'll talk about what "highest and best usage" means. We'll start with the more formal elements of the process, drawing largely from definitions and procedures created by The Appraisal Institute, because the appraisal business has a clear definition and strategy for identifying the highest and best use of a property (Ribera et. Al., (2020)). Then we'll look at some potential applications of highest and best use in commercial real estate purchase, development, and appraisal.

The highest and best use of a property is defined as follows, according to The Appraisal Institute's The Appraisal of Real Estate, 13th Edition link:

The most likely and lawful use of unoccupied land or upgraded property that is physically viable, appropriately supported, and financially practical.

The Appraisal Institute has also developed a series of criteria known as The Four Tests that include the variables that an appraiser must examine when evaluating a property's highest and best use.

Each of these four tests can be a complicated and thorough procedure, which is beyond the scope of this essay, but the basic notion should be clear. Below are the four tests, along with brief descriptions of each.

Which use situations are legally permitted, as defined by legislation, zoning, and other land use regulations?
Buildings on the edge of a mountain or in a marsh are unlikely to be physically feasible.
Is the property's use case financially realistic, given the area's demographics and market?
Is the intended use of the land as fruitful as it possibly may be?

These four variables make intuitive sense. If a proposed use is not authorised by law and is practically impossible to build on the given piece of land, it is unlikely to be the highest and best use for that property. Similarly, if the property's use does not match well with the surrounding demographics and commercial activity, it will not be as productive as it could be, and a new use may be able to realise more of the property's potential.

As previously stated, determining the results of each of The Four Tests may need extensive investigation and skill. To evaluate the legality of a certain use case for a property, attorneys and/or land use specialists may be required. Engineers may be necessary to assess the property's appropriateness for specific types of building. Real estate specialists will also be involved in assessing if the property is financially viable and productive to the maximum extent possible (Kim et. Al., (2018)). While each of these tests is essential, the remainder of this article will focus on the property's financial feasibility, assuming that the study is being done to assess the property's investment or development possibilities.

Before we go any further, it's worth noting that determining the highest and best use may necessitate somewhat different techniques depending on whether the property is unoccupied or has previously been upgraded ( G. Kim, (2016)). We'll discuss the differences between the two in more detail below, but we'll try to convey the principles more broadly for usage on either unoccupied land or existing property.

Analysis of Investment and Valuation

Market analysis plays a big role in determining a property's financial viability. Previous articles on market leasing assumptions and similar property analysis explain how to conduct a comprehensive market study in greater detail (Kim et. Al., (2016)). Regardless of the property's intended use, an analyst must be well-versed on several key characteristics of the market and the property's position within it.

Numerous analyses focus largely on current market circumstances, but overlooking key aspects of how the market may change over time can considerably raise the financial risk of a property throughout its hold term. Some of these characteristics are discussed in further depth further down.

Current Market Trends

Market and submarket sales and leasing patterns give a wealth of information on the market's health. The health of the leasing market may be determined by factors like as occupancy, lease rates, and absorption, while the number of sales, price per square foot, cap rates, and time-on-market trends can provide insight into how appealing the region is for investment returns.

Physical Characteristics

Structural obsolescence may be a big stumbling block to a property's full potential. Obsolescence can be caused by a design that no longer serves the present demography, a lack of technical skills, or a variety of other factors, but a property that no longer provides what the market requires does not reach its highest and best usage.

Attributes of Location

Some places will become more valuable as cities evolve, while others will become less desirable. The building or upgrading of new roads might alter a property's access dynamics (J. Németh, & J. Langhorst, (2014)). After a new access ramp is built, a piece of property off a major highway that was previously difficult to reach might be the ideal location for a new business park. However, the same access ramp that makes it easier to commute to one piece of property may make another property appear less appealing.

Performance as it is now vs. that which might be achieved in the future

It's also a good idea to look at patterns across a variety of property kinds to see if there's any overlap. For many years, the Financial District in Manhattan, for example, had a slew of office buildings and corporate headquarters. Companies continued to relocate to newer buildings in midtown Manhattan over time, and the Financial District's office market began to dwindle. The office buildings were later turned into residential residences by developers.Despite business rates and occupancy were falling, the residential market in the region was improving dramatically ( F. Tajani,&  P. Morano, (2017)). During this time, the highest and best use of a property shifted from office to residential, underlining the reality that present uses may not be the most financially beneficial.

Sites that are (or might be) competitive

Frequently, the focus of study is on currently available properties on the market. While current assets must undoubtedly be examined, locations (both vacant land and existing properties) must also be evaluated for their future development potential. It's not unusual to see significant new development of raw land during real estate and building booms. If there is equally or better-suited land nearby for the same use case, the appraiser must examine it.

Let's assume a company buys a suburban office building in an area with few office properties and good performance (steady occupancy), but the region also has a lot of open land that may be developed into offices. If the region experiences a building boom in the future, additional office premises may be built, putting the businesses' assets in lesser demand and increasing competition.

Modification Cost vs. Existing Use

With the exception of market trends, the above considerations may need a large financial investment for reconstruction or repositioning of a property. An analyst must assess if the potential gain in value would be greater than the expense of the improvements required to meet the property's highest and best use (Pearsall et. Al., (2014)). If the expense of improvements exceeds the gain in value, the present use of the property will most likely remain the highest and best usage.

Proformas Financial

By building discounted cash flows and estimating the prospective value, all of the information gathered about a property should be used to evaluate the financial performance. The highest and best use of the property may then be identified (or is close to being found).

Conclusion

The assessment of the highest and best use sometimes necessitates a more in-depth methodology than a straightforward valuation, but it can also yield insights that an analyst would overlook using a traditional valuation technique. And, while conclusive answers to some of the four variables used to identify the highest and best usage may necessitate the participation of experts from other fields, an analyst should be aware of the procedures involved and take them into account in their research.

This Economics Assignment has been solved by our Economics experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.