Highlights
Task:
Essay Topic for CORE 1010 Philosophy – Winter Term 2021
It is very important that you read this Topic Sheet all the way through to ensure that your essay will comply with the requirements.
Background
In this Course, you will become familiar with a range of philosophical topics and issues. This essay challenges you to use your understanding of one of these topics, together with your capacity for synthesising and utilising the arguments of others, to construct a case in favour of one ‘side’ of a philosophical dispute.
Task
You are to defend one of the following propositions using your knowledge of philosophy. Empirical data and examples can be utilised to support, explain, or exemplify your philosophical argument.
Proposition 1: Individual statements are true or false according to how accurately they describe (or ‘correspond with’) states of affairs in the world.
OR
Proposition 2: Individual statements are true or false according to whether, and how well, they cohere (or ‘fit together’) with a wider set of other beliefs already held to be true.
Structure
You must structure your essay according to the guidelines provided in the Writing Skills material provided in the Learning Materials folder (Lessons 2-7) on Blackboard.
References and Referencing
You must reference all of your sources using either Chicago Manual of Style 17th edition or the referencing style of your own School, including page numbers and a full Bibliography or Reference List.
The following sources will assist you to develop your argument. They cover a range of theoretical perspectives and practical approaches to the topic. You must use at least two of them. In addition, you should feel free to locate up to two of your own references. Note that these references must be scholarly references, primarily journal articles or academic books, and peer reviewed. You can find these references through the University’s Library website. As well, you may use any of the CORE 1010 learning material provided in Blackboard.
David, Marian. “The Correspondence Theory of Truth.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta, 2015. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/truth-correspondence/
Dorsey, Dale. “A Coherence Theory of Truth in Ethics.” Philosophical Studies 127 no. 3 (2006): 493-523. https://findit.library.nd.edu.au/permalink/61UONDA_INST/1ntajja/cdi_proquest_journals_196645628Dowden, Bradley, and Norman Swartz. “Truth.” In Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by James Fieser and Bradley Dowden. https://iep.utm.edu/truth/
Engel, Pascal. Truth. London: Routledge, 2002. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/unda/detail.action?docID=1900051
Glanzberg, Michael. “Truth.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta, 2018. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/truth/Ginsborg, Hannah. “Reasons for Belief.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 72 no. 2: 286-318. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40040926Thagard, Paul. “Coherence, Truth, and the Development of Scientific Knowledge.” Philosophy of Science 74 no. 1 (2007): 28-47.
Young, James. The Coherence Theory of Truth. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta, 2018. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/truth-coherence/
The above Management Assignment has been solved by our Management Assignment Experts at onlineassignmentbank. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.
© Copyright 2026 My Uni Papers – Student Hustle Made Hassle Free. All rights reserved.