The Relevant Rationality of Youth Governance & Analysis of Historical, Socio Cultural - Social Sceince Assignment Help

Assignment Task -

Introduction  

The introduction should include exactly which proposed to change your paper will examine.  You must provide a statement of the proposed change and whether you support or refute it  (NOT BOTH). Provide an overview of the main arguments you will adopt in your briefing paper. The introduction should also identify your recommendation. Do not elaborate here,  you will do so in the recommendation section, instead; state what your briefing paper will propose, as the final, evidenced-based, course of action for government. Your recommendation should align with your position on the proposed change.  

Background  

This section must provide the appropriate context that will guide your analysis of the proposal. You should consider factors such as historical, socio-cultural, socio-political, and economic that may have played a role in the government’s decision to consider the response to juvenile offending you have chosen to write your paper on.  

In this section, you must:  

Identify the relevant rationality of youth governance (e.g. welfarism, justice, corporatism)  and corresponding strategy (neo-liberalism, neo-conservatism, responsibilization,  managerialism, restoration, risk, or remoralisation). Do NOT define all of these but instead define and outline only that which is MOST relevant to your chosen proposed change. Also,  only incorporate aspects of the rationality/strategy that are relevant to your proposed change.  This will allow you to present an explicit and succinct connection between the proposed change and the youth governance approach that underpins it.  

The learning materials from Modules 4 and 5 would be essential starting points to assist with  this section. However, you could also consider political ecology theory and the role of the media when discussing the background. 

Research and analysis of the proposed change  

This is an important section as it presents the evidence to back your position. This section should contain the relevant research and analysis that informs your position on the proposed change. Here, you must consider the effects the proposed change will have on young people.  Your analysis must consider the nature and extent of youth offending (Module 2) and the correlates of offending and victimization (Module 3). Module 2 included engagement with readings and practitioner insights on the types of crime young people commit and documented the patterns of youth offending. Module 3 considered the victim/offender nexus and the correlates. So, does the research evidence and practitioner insights, validate or invalidate the proposed change? This is the core focus of this section. Some references to  Module 1 debates may also be useful.

I provide some questions below that you should consider in your analysis. Do not write this section in a question and answer format, but use the questions as a guide to help you organize your work into conventional academic paragraphs.  

1. If you support the proposal, what evidence is there to show a positive effect of going ahead with the proposed amendment? Similarly, if you reject the proposal, what evidence is there to show a negative impact?  

2. Discuss the possible impact on specific groups of young people. Groups may include those with a physical/cognitive disability, ethnic minority youth, indigenous youth,  migrant youth, those with a mental illness, low/socio-economic groups, youth with a  substance abuse disorder, gender-based impacts, etc. Do not focus on all these groups but only those possibly affected by the proposed change that is the focus of your briefing paper.  

3. Discuss other national and international jurisdictions that have incorporated such a  change into their laws. What impact did the change have on young people? Were there any particular groups disproportionately affected. If yes, how did the change affect them? Look at recidivism rates (if relevant).  

4. The available research evidence must support claims; present specific data, and cite your sources.  

Conclusion 

Your paper MUST make a recommendation for action. If you accept the proposed change,  your recommendation section will use available evidence to outline exactly how the amendment is to be effectively implemented. If you reject the proposed amendment, you must look at the best alternative that the research evidence and practitioner insights suggest would be more effective in responding to youth offending.

Therefore, if your argument is that spending millions of State funds on a new detention center is not an appropriate initiative to address juvenile offending, then your recommendation must present something different for the government to consider. Your recommendation cannot simply be; ‘this briefing paper recommends that X should not be implemented’. This is not an acceptable recommendation.  You must provide a course of action to follow your position.;

This Social Science Assignment has been solved by our Social Science Experts at onlineassignmentbank. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.

Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment Experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.