The Therapeutic Intervention Case Study - Nursing Assignment Help

Assignment Task

Description
Begin by preparing a case study from your own clinical practice. The case study is to provide the basis from which you will then develop your written assignment/discussion paper examining and critiquing the therapeutic intervention you used, or intended to use.

Please do not use the person’s name, or refer to the person as ’the patient’ or ‘the client’ – use a pseudonym.

Include in your discussion paper the following:
A brief synopsis of your case study
Overview of the therapeutic intervention you used when working with the consumer and rationale for utilising this approach
How you developed your skills in using this intervention
Critique and analyse your intervention using relevant literature, including clinical guidelines, efficacy and outcome studies and evidence


Opportunity to Reattempt
Students will not be given the opportunity to re-attempt this assessment
ASSESSMENT 3: WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT
Assessment 3: Written Assignment - Case study
Criteria Marks Score
Structure and cohesion of case study overall (10%) 0 marks
Structure and cohesion not apparent 1-3 points
Evidence of attempt to provide structure and cohesion to paper 4-6 points
Structure clear with solid attempt at ensuring cohesion overall 7-8 points
Structure clear, and concise with overall cohesion apparent 9-10 points
Well-structured paper, clear and concise, easy to read and well organised; a coherent and complete document /10
Brief synopsis of case study (10%) 0-2 points
Less than adequate synopsis. 3-4 points
Some evidence of attempt to provide a synopsis of case study. 5-6 points
Adequate synopsis of the case study. 7-8 points
Competent and succinct synopsis of the case study. 9-10 points
Focused, clear and concise synopsis of the case study demonstrating careful thought. /10
Overview of the therapeutic intervention, its rationale for use, skill development (10%) 0-2 points
Not attempted, or minimal attempt only. 3-4 points
Limited overview with key areas superficially covered. 5-6 points
Adequate overview with key areas addressed. 7-8 points
Succinct and competently structured overview with all key areas covered. 9-10 points
Focused and well-developed overview with all key areas covered  and clarified succinctly. /10
Synopsis of evidence base for use of the intervention (20%) 0 points
Not attempted. 1-5 points
Limited synopsis with minimal key evidence included. 7-10 points
Well-structured synopsis with key evidence clearly summarised. 11-15 points
Competent synopsis with key evidence clearly identified. 16-20 points
Clear, concise synopsis with key evidence succinctly summarised. /20
Constructive critique & analysis of therapeutic intervention
(25%) 0 points
Critique and analysis not attempted. 1-8 points
Limited critique with some reference to key literature. 9-14 points
Demonstrating some competency in critique & analysis with integration of key references. 15-19 points
Competent and comprehensive critique & analysis with strong integration of key references and concepts. 20-25 points
Demonstrates profound critique & analysis with sound justification of responses and defended integration of key references and concepts. /25
Ethical issues and concerns (10%) 0 marks
Not addressed. 1-3 points
Some attempt to address this aspect. 4-6 points
Adequate discussion of this aspect. 7-8 points
Competent discussion demonstrating careful thought. 9-10 points
Focused discussion demonstrating careful thought and depth of insight. /10
Use of evidence to support discussion (15%) 0-2 points
Discussion supported mostly by personal opinion. Very poor use of resource material and no APA referencing. 3-6 points
Limited sources cited, too few, or of poor quality, little evidence of scope and depth of reading – poor and limited APA referencing. 7-9 points
Sources cited showed relevance to the topic, but were limited in scope and/or quality – incorrect APA referencing. 10-12 points
Sources cited showed relevance to the topic and were developing in scope and/or quality. Mostly correct APA referencing. 13-15 points
Sources cited were relevant to the topic and showed scope and quality. Flawless APA referencing. /15

This Nursing Assignment has been solved by our Nursing Experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.
    
Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment Experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.