Tulchinsky and Varavikova (2014) summed Up The Statistics - Law Assignment

Internal Code: My Uni Paper12

Law Assignment:

Case Study: Tulchinsky and Varavikova (2014) summed up the statistics of this tragedy, which stuck on December 03 rd, 1984. They stated that around 3,800 died within minutes of this incident and a number of others had to face lifelong illnesses. Varuggheese (2013) noticed that even though twenty-six years had passed since the worst industrial catastrophe of the world, the repercussions of this incident continue to haunt the members of the nation, particularly of the city of Bhopal. Blanpain, Bromwich and Rymkevich (2011) chalked out the entire incident in his book and highlighted at different instances, the failure of the Union Carbide in taking the requisite steps to avoid the incidence of this magnitude, where a smaller incident had occurred just a few days before the real catastrophe struck, with a particular reference to CSR (explain what this is) . Fortun (2009) reported the conviction of the seven former executives of the company for causing death due to negligence, which came in 2010. Saraf and Karanjikar (2005) noted this tragedy as a watershed event with regards to the process safety, which has led to the paradigm shift in the outlook of the public and the industry towards the risk management, particularly in the matter of processing industries. Palazzi, Currò and Fabiano (2015) also analysed this incident in the backdrop of an approach towards the safety equipment and the emergency time evaluation based on the actual information of this tragedy. Baofu (2011) noted that this incident not only had short-term impact but had a long-term impact as well, due to the nature of the gas leak. He further noticed that even though a Relief and Rehabilitation Department had been formed by October 200, where 554,895 victims were awarded compensation for their loss, the after-effects of this incident, still continues to char the people of that city. In this regard, he highlighted the loss of life, livestock, nature and the scarcity of pure water and safe food. All this is a descriptive account of what occurred Questions: 1) Identifying the reasons which led to this tragedy mayhem. 2)Identifying the people responsible for this mayhem and what happened to them 3) The actions which could have been taken in order to safeguard this incident from occurring, at different instances. 4)The cost of this tragedy, in terms of victims, and the other costs including that of rehabilitation, recovery and reestablishment. 5)To identify if there is a possibility of reoccurrence of such incident. 6) In the context of globalisation and human rights what were the conditions conducive to the tragedy and have they been addressed?