UGB361: Developing the Reflexive Practitioner - Report Writing - Management Assignment Help

Assignment Task

Introduction

For this module there is one individual research-based assessment which is presented as a ‘Developing Reflexive Practitioner Reflection’.

Increasingly there is recognition of the significance of professional development within the management professions (e.g., HRM, Marketing Management, Financial Management and Management including Leadership). Therefore, this research aims to present you with the opportunity to develop as a reflexive professional and scholar practitioner (Armstrong, 2018b).

Managers today increasingly find themselves facing unexpected problems, needing to learn how to cope with complex environments and to take action in an often-chaotic flow of events. This is achieved by creating space for collaborative dialogue between managers and researchers, and supplementing it with the integration of a reflexive writing practice (Ripamonti et al., 2016: 55).

This research is positioned within a critical qualitative inquiry (Denzin, 2017) and using a bricolage approach as reflexive digital bricolage (Armstrong, 2018a)

This research consists of TWO parts as follows:

Part A: Introduction and Research Design

This includes:

1. Research Aim, Research Context and Literature Review (30 Marks) For this research you choose one of the research aims listed below:

- Making sense of feelings and emotions

- Increasing self-awareness

- Understanding and making sense of a trigger (‘A Critical incident’).

From the professional body to frame your research choose at least 3 behaviours or values or professional standards (this is dependent upon the professional body).

For this part you are required to write at least 1000 words on your choice of research aim, the choice of professional body context and how you will approach this reflection as a literature review using academic citations of the approach to journaling (e.g. writing through the mirror; metaphorical approaches; artistic approaches; critical incident; mirror metaphors; cycles of reflection; experiential approaches; biographical approaches).

2. Research Design, Methodology and Method

The purpose of this part is for you to critique and justify your research design in terms of

(i) your methodology (e.g., reflexive dialogic action research; reflexivity; auto-ethnographic practices; arts based or a bricolage of methodologies) and

(ii) your method (Cycles of reflection e.g., Gibbs cycle or Gardner Cycle; JOHARI window; your personal cultural texts including your approach to coding these as qualitative data) and

(iii) a critique of the research design (this is where you discuss and evaluate your researcher voice and the challenges you faced completing this critical qualitative inquiry).

This should be at least 1000 words and you are expected to have academic citations to support your critique and evaluation of your research design, methodology and method.

You are required to provide a full bibliographic list of academic citations (all readings which you have cited in text and also read but not cited) using the Harvard referencing system. This does not count towards the word count.

Part B: Digital Storyboard

This is the presentation of the analysed personal cultural texts in the form of a ‘storyboard’. The storyboard can be presented as either (choose 1 only);

- At least a 1000 word Critical Incident Analysis

- At least a 1000 word Creative Writing

- At least a 500 word Critical Incident Analysis + At least a 500 word Creative Writing

- Video reflection in the form of a vlog (at least 5 minutes and no longer than 10 minutes)

- Audio reflection in the form of a podcast (at least 5 minutes and no longer than 10 minutes)

The word limit is set as 3,000 words

This UGB361-Management Assignment has been solved by our Management Experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing Style. Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered.

You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turn tin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.