US Policies and Global Security - Michael Cox and Doug Stokes - Brian Schmidt’s Critical Review Writing Assignment Help

Internal Code: 1ACBHD

US Policies Critical Review Writing Assignment Help

Assignment Task: My other unit assessment is due soon Assignment due Thursday, 28 March 2019 Length:-1000 words Using the theories and concepts learnt in this unit so far, write a critical review of Brian Schmidt’s chapter: “Theories of US foreign policy” in Michael Cox and Doug Stokes (eds), US Foreign Policy, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), 2nd edn, pp. 5-20. A PDF copy of this reading is available below.Before you start your review, please read the notes below on “Writing a critical review”.Assessment will be based on three components: your analysis, your research, and your expression.The critical review is usually an assessment and evaluation of the author's argument in a given text. This involves first identifying what the argument is, and then considering its weaknesses and strengths, in light of additional research. Thus, you would formulate your position on the author's argument, based on your understanding of its central concepts and on your research.It is not a descriptive summary of what the author has discussed. A critical review provides an analysis of the article selected for critique. It is not simply ‘critical’ in the ordinary sense of the word, but provides an evaluation of the author’s argument by considering its pros and cons in a fair and scholarly manner. It does not involve attacking the author’s ideas or discussing biographical information about the author. Nor is this simply a case of presenting your ideas (‘I think’, ‘I believe’…etc) versus the author’s: you need to support your conclusions about the argument presented with adequate, scholarly research.You should begin by identifying what the author’s argument is, and secondly, to evaluate the basis of this argument by doing adequate research of the subject in question. For example, why does Schmidt focus so heavily on various theories rather than the actual process of foreign policy making? What other explanations for foreign policy decision making are there that Schmidt has overlooked? Is it really necessary to understand all the theoretical explanations that he provides? Is any specific one more informative than the others? Are his examples of the Cold War's emergence and US grand strategy good demonstrations of these different theories? In essence, you should be focusing you analysis of Schmidt's chapter around these four points: * On the basis of your research, is the argument made a sound one? (i.e. is the reasoning sound?)* Is it adequately supported with evidence? What examples has the author used to demonstrate his points?* What flaws or shortcomings are there? (Are there any oversights, for instance?) What other perspectives are there?* How has this subject been understood by other scholars?You must do adequate research to produce a satisfactory critique. Please, do not rely on the lectures and the readings provided for the relevant topics, as you must demonstrate a capacity to carry out your own research. Note that while lectures introduce central concepts and develop your understanding of these, they do not count as research and should only be referenced if you want to cite something specific that was said during one. My rule of thumb for references in undergraduate essays is that there should be five (5) sources minimum per 1000 words; this does not include the chapter that you are reviewing (i.e. the minimum sources that your reference section should have is 6).All assessments must be submitted in Microsoft Word format. Other files types will not be accepted.Assignments should use a 12-point font and 1.5 or double line spacing.Please use the Chicago Style for in-text citations. This is the one of the most commonly used citation style in the social and political sciences. You can find out about it here:The review should follow the conventions of writing an essay with an introduction, main body and a conclusion. Please do not use headings for these sections. This is not a business report.The body should contain a short summary of the article in question and a critique of it.Your review should be an argument with a thesis that expresses your judgment of the article.Support any statements you make, including your opinions, with evidence, explanations and examples.A few well chosen quotations can convey the ‘flavour’ of the author’s style as well as illustrating a point.Read the chosen article, consider propositions, take a perspective and then find other articles etc.We use the critical review essay to give you the opportunity to read one piece of writing thoroughly, and to enable you to understand that most opinions expressed in the reading materials are contested. You should develop a hypothesis and support your opinion by other refereed opinions. Your conclusion, therefore, should draw together these threads and, on balance, the argument you put forward should favour your perspective. If you need more information please contact me.

This Critical Review Writing Assignment has been solved by our Review Writing experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.