Highlights
Major Comments:
Structure of this paper is pathetic, author explained an existing algorithms without any problem statements and explanation.
Result and comparison not giving any sense,author should explain the result portion effectively.
Follow guidelines to improve the quality and presentation of the manuscript. General Guidelines:
1. Abstract: It is suitable that this part of the paper describes the obtained results with a higher degree of synthesis. Moreover, it is recommended that acronyms do not appear inside an abstract. Hence, we suggest the authors to revise some parts in order to underline only the most meaningful aspects of the research and to remove acronyms. Moreover, we are recommend you to rewrite your abstract it single paragraph. Arrange Keywords alphabetically for better representation. Abstract contain maximum 150 words and 5 keywords.(Please note that an abstract consists of one paragraph only and is written in present tense).
2. The paper structure should be revised. I would suggest the standard section - Introduction,Related works, Methods, Results, Discussion, and Conclusion. 3. Section I: Introduction: This Section should describes the originality of the proposed issue.However, We suggest the authors to add further details about the advantages of the proposed approach with respect to the ones used commonly. 4. Author should state their goal and the paper novelty (also over other approaches) in a more concise and clear way.Generally, do not integrate colloquial speech and common phrases that do not have any added value. Please use professional language.In the final paragraph, explain the structure of the manuscript. 5. Section II: Improve related work content, provide details review on recent year papers.2017-2020 research papers minimum 5 papers - maximum 10 papers. 6. Section III: Author should discuss the novelty of this work in terms of mathematical models and examples. Show the theoretical reason why the proposed technique is better than existing techniques, because author should explain theoretical explanation about compared existing technique appeared suddenly in Sect.3.
7. Do not integrate figures,tables and equations with out any details or added value. The added value of each figure,tables and equations and its outcome should be described with sufficient detail. Update good quality of figures with units and axis details.Number all the figures,tables and equations in ascending order. Place the reference in proper section, reference are randomly placed here.
8. Section IV & V: Follow, conference format to avoid format problems.The author should consider extending their analysis to a bigger data sets / Create a test models to validate your results with existing papers.Without existing paper comparison this research paper will not be recommend for publication. Discussion on tables and figures are insufficient, improve the quality comparison.
9. In the conclusion the authors should state the limitations,research findings and future works of their method. Reference section is too week to consider for publication, include minimum 25 published research articles.Don’t use links, white papers in reference section.
10. We are expecting minimum 5 pages , so maintain minimum page limitation. English language: it is quite accurate but I recommend the authors a careful control in order to avoid trivial mistakes.
11. Please improve the reference format. This is very important for indexing service. Important *Do not use “et al.” in author names.
12. Please format your manuscript by using the journal template and check your manuscript based on the format check list. Your manuscript has serious violations in spacing.
This Engineering Assignment has been solved by our Engineering Experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.
Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment Experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.
© Copyright 2026 My Uni Papers – Student Hustle Made Hassle Free. All rights reserved.