Highlights
A critical review in epidemiology and public health evaluates the clarity, quality and originality of research, as well as its relevance and presentation. A good review carefully analyses an article's strengths and weaknesses - remember that no observational study is perfect – and then assess its overall value. Writing a critical review is a useful academic exercise that helps to improve basic epidemiological skills. By assessing the work of others, you will become familiar with specific evaluation criteria for public health research and develop critical thinking skills that has a more general application. Critiquing other scientific research will help you to develop good writing skills which will be essential for you in the future.
The learning outcomes from of this assessment are to:
1. efficiently and critically review and interpret the scientific literature in public health
2. apply principles of epidemiology when evaluating research
Make sure you understand all requirements for the critical review that is specific to the type of study you are reviewing. There are different criteria for reporting different types of epidemiological studies, students are encouraged to explore different reporting guidelines relevant to the research paper they have chosen. There are multiple guidelines for conducting a critical review.
Please select from one of the three published articles that details epidemiological research on an emerging, debatable, public health issue:
1. Beane Freeman, L. E., A. J. Deroos, S. Koutros, A. Blair, M. H. Ward, M. Alavanja, and J. A. Hoppin. 2012. "Poultry and livestock exposure and cancer risk among farmers in the agricultural health study." Cancer Causes Control 23 (5):663-70. doi: 10.1007/s10552-012-9921-1.
2. Adewuyi, Emmanuel O, Asa Auta, Vishnu Khanal, Samson J Tapshak, and Yun Zhao. 2019. "Cesarean delivery in Nigeria: prevalence and associated factors?a population-based cross- sectional study." BMJ Open 9 (6):e027273. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027273.
3. Girschik, J., J. Heyworth, and L. Fritschi. 2013. "Self-reported sleep duration, sleep quality, and breast cancer risk in a population-based case-control study." Am J Epidemiol 177 (4):316- 27. doi: 10.1093/aje/kws422.
This Health Assessment has been solved by our Health Experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.
Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.
© Copyright 2026 My Uni Papers – Student Hustle Made Hassle Free. All rights reserved.