WHS KPIs and Management Theory Assessment

Part A: BUSINESS DETAILS

• Name of the Business:

• Business Description – What does the Business do?

• Where is the Business based?

  • Local: Yes / No

  • What City?

  • National: Yes / No

  • What Country?

  • International: Yes / No

• Number of Employees:

Part B: ORGANISATIONS – MANAGEMENT THEORIES

Read pages 4–6 of Chapter 10.1 The Organisation Section 2 – Historical Context of the OHS Body of Knowledge and research the Safety Policies from your business in Part A .

• Include the business’s safety policy.

Note: If your chosen business does not have a safety policy, choose another business.

• Identify the management theory that is evident from the safety policy and your examination of the business.

• Explain your reasoning, and include other relevant information where applicable.

Part C: KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

In this section, list the occupational health and safety KPIs that are reported by the business you have selected.

Add more rows if needed.

Part D: STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES OF KPIs

Read “The Future of Health and Safety Reporting” and two other sources found through your own research, and describe three strengths and three weaknesses of using KPIs from The Future of Health and Safety Reporting (Australian Council of Superannuation Investors, 2019).

Strengths
1.
2.
3.

Weaknesses
1.
2.
3.

REFERENCES

List all sources where you obtained your information, using Harvard Referencing Style .

Assessment Summary and Requirements

The assessment required an individual component worksheet on organizational management and occupational health and safety (OHS), with a page limit of 3 to 5 pages. It was divided into four main parts:

• Part A: Business Details: Required basic information about a chosen business, including its name, description, location (local, national, or international), and number of employees.

• Part B: Management Theories: Asked students to find the OHS policy of their chosen business, identify the management theory evident in it (e.g., scientific management, human relations, etc.), and provide a reasoned explanation.

• Part C: Key Performance Indicators (KPIs): Required students to list the OHS KPIs reported by the business, along with their results and classification as leading, lagging, or positive performance indicators.

• Part D: Strengths and Weaknesses of KPIs: Required students to analyze the strengths and weaknesses of using OHS KPIs, drawing on a specific provided source ("The Future of Health and Safety Reporting") and two additional external sources.

• References: A final section for a reference list, formatted using the Harvard Referencing Style.

Assessment Approach and Process

The academic mentor guided the student through the assessment using a step-by-step approach to ensure all requirements were met systematically.

Step 1: Planning and Business Selection

The first step was to help the student understand the scope of the assessment and choose a suitable business. The mentor advised the student to select a business with an easily accessible OHS policy and readily available information on its OHS performance, making the task of gathering information for Parts B and C simpler. The mentor also advised the student to read through all parts of the assessment first, so they understood the overall requirements and could plan their research accordingly.

Step 2: Completing Part A and Research for Part B

With a business selected, the student started by filling out the details for Part A. The mentor then guided the student on how to conduct effective research for Part B. This involved searching the company's website for an OHS policy or annual reports. Once the policy was found, the mentor explained different management theories and helped the student analyze the policy's wording to identify which theory was most prominent. For example, if the policy focused on strict rules and procedures, the mentor suggested that it aligns with scientific management. If it emphasized employee consultation and well-being, it would be closer to a human relations approach.

Step 3: Data Collection for Part C

The mentor then assisted the student in finding and listing the specific OHS KPIs reported by the business for Part C. They explained the difference between leading, lagging, and positive indicators.

• Leading indicators are proactive measures (e.g., number of safety training sessions completed).

• Lagging indicators are reactive measures of past performance (e.g., number of injuries or fatalities).

• Positive performance indicators show progress toward a goal (e.g., reduction in incident rates). The mentor showed the student how to find this data in the company's annual or sustainability reports, which often have dedicated sections on safety performance.

Step 4: Critical Analysis for Part D

For Part D, the mentor provided the core document, "The Future of Health and Safety Reporting," and helped the student conduct additional research for the two other required sources. The mentor emphasized the importance of using scholarly or reputable sources (e.g., academic journals, government reports). They then guided the student in synthesizing information from all three sources to identify three key strengths and weaknesses of using OHS KPIs. This step required critical thinking and the ability to articulate these points clearly.

Step 5: Referencing and Final Review

Finally, the mentor provided a refresher on the Harvard Referencing Style, stressing the importance of correctly citing all sources used across the document. The mentor also performed a final review of the complete worksheet, checking for clarity, coherence, and adherence to the page limit, ensuring all sections were well-structured and properly addressed.

Learning Outcomes and Final Result

The final outcome was a comprehensive assessment solution that met all the specified requirements. The student successfully demonstrated their ability to:

• Conduct targeted research to gather specific business and OHS information.

• Analyze and apply management theories to real-world business policies.

• Identify and classify OHS key performance indicators .

• Critically evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of a reporting system based on multiple sources.

• Properly cite sources using the Harvard Referencing Style.

Ready to Ace Your Assignment?

Unlock your potential with our expertly crafted sample solutions! This document is more than just a solution; it’s a detailed guide designed to help you understand complex concepts, see how to structure your arguments, and master academic writing. Use it as a powerful study tool to guide your own research and improve your grades.

A quick word on plagiarism: This sample is for your reference and learning purposes only. Submitting it as your own work is a serious academic offense and can lead to severe penalties. The smartest way to use this is to learn from it and create your own unique assignment.

Want a guaranteed plagiarism-free solution tailored just for you? Our team of professional academic writers is ready to create a brand-new, custom assignment from scratch. It'll be 100% original and written to your specific requirements, saving you time and stress while ensuring top marks.

Download Sample Solution

Order Fresh Assignment