Work Constructively and Collaboratively with Stakeholders - Accounting Assignment Help

Assignment Task

Course Objectives
The following Unit Learning Objectives (ULO) summarise the Unit Learning Outcomes that must be satisfied to successfully complete this course:
ULO1: Work constructively and collaboratively with stakeholders, business networks, and peers to formulate a design thinking approach to innovation.
Assignment brief
As you progress through the modules in this course ‘Innovation by Design’, you will be required to undertake a range of readings, watch demonstrations of the way in which certain design thinking tools are used in practice, and attempt to apply those tools to understand and ultimately define a project definition for an industry problem. For this, you must recollect the work that you have done and identify the following based on your learnings from both of the following:
The problem that you are investigating
The tools and processes that you have been asked to use 
As you undertake the work, record your reflections and insights. Your assessment task requires you to develop a nuanced and clear problem statement arising out of the insights gained using the process; you are also required to annotate a portfolio of evidence of the project completed to explain the benefits and uses of design thinking tools for understanding your problem and, specifically, how and why you might use these tools in your own future work lives; what you would do again and/or differently; what you have learnt about yourself; what your own learning style is; and, importantly, your own contributions to a team as a consequence of the work completed in this course. 
The global pandemic that began in 2020 has affected India more significantly than many other countries. The complexities of managing the crisis have been evident from the beginning. In addition to this, there have been growing concerns regarding the take-up of vaccines and growing hesitancies about getting vaccinated. 
In this course, you will be asked to examine the question of COVID-19 vaccines from the perspective of Indian businesses, with a view to deeply understand the problem.
The Problem:
Every time you are asked to work on the Industry Problem, you are being asked to apply what you have learned in this course to the following problem. Your focus in this course and this assignment would be to uncover human needs and motivators or pain points that are already creating, or will shortly create, challenges as corporations transition into the ‘COVID Normal’.
Many complex matters need to be addressed before Indian plant, factory and office workers return to work, and it is quite likely that the future of work and the experiences of individual workers will significantly differ from those prior to the pandemic.
Since the end of April, Indian citizens over the age of 18 years have been eligible to receive the vaccine. However, the task of vaccinating India’s enormous population is a significant logistical issue that is affected by the sheer size of the country and the number of people involved. 
Your task is to focus specifically on the issue of hesitancy–understanding who is hesitant about receiving the vaccine, what their concerns are and why they have them to create a clear problem statement that will assist you and your teammates in identifying some real pain points (or issues) that will form the basis of the ‘solution’ that you will ideate in the next module. The stakeholders experiencing (or likely to experience) the problem that you have identified will create a demand for the solution that you will develop. You need to clearly define your stakeholder group and deeply empathise with the issues that they are facing or are likely to face to address the problem and be cognisant of the potential market and the opportunity for the solution that you are yet to design.
During this course, you will be introduced to a range of design thinking tools that will help you understand the people and circumstances relevant to your industry problem. This assignment requires you to use these tools to identify and understand your stakeholders using design thinking approaches to problem identification. You also need to understand and elicit insights about your chosen subjects, their circumstances, needs, desires and frustrations with a view to prepare a design brief that will be the basis for a solution design exercise (to be completed in the next module). You will submit a portfolio showing the artefacts that you have created during the problem identification stages of the design thinking process along with the annotations where you have outlined your learnings (of the subject matter of the research and your use of design thinking tools) while using these tools and reflecting on the applicability of these tools to your own work and life.
 
Expectations from you:
This assignment does not require you to identify a potential solution. If you move forward too quickly to a solution, you are likely to limit your opportunities to do well in this assignment.  You will be assigned to a team during this course, and you will be expected to work with and communicate with your team. However, the work that you submit will be individual work that will be individually marked. You will continue to work with that group in the next course, where you will collaborate to create a solution to a design brief that will relate to this same industry problem. The work that you do, both individually and with your team, requires you to have a deep understanding of the problem in ways that you can share insights with your teammates and work with them to create an innovative solution to a problem based on a shared understanding.
 
To summarise, the key deliverables from you would include:
The filled up checklist
Annotated portfolio created using the artefacts that you worked on during the course
Reflections on the artefacts
Your submissions can be any of the following: a PowerPoint presentation (20-30 slides), a Word document (15-20 pages), or a combination of the two. 
 
A special note about annotations: Please spend some time reading the assessment criteria carefully. The purpose of annotating the portfolio is twofold:
To demonstrate the ways in which you use the tools that you will learn about to draw insights about the problem
To reflect on the use of these tools and to articulate how and when these tools may be valuable to your future work
 
A good way to reflect on experience is to use a framework that prompts deep and purposeful thinking about what happened. The 5Rs (modified as 4Rs below) of the reflection (Bain et al. 2002) is one such framework. The five elements of this framework are Reporting, Responding, Reasoning, Relating, and Reconstructing. When used effectively, reflection can facilitate significant personal and/or professional growth. Using the following checklist will help you ensure that you have reflected on each of the tools.
 
 
Reflection Prompt What to Cover
Report / Respond Include a brief description of the tool, how you used it, and what you learnt about the problem by using itState your reaction to the tool. What did you learn about your own learning, and how would you use this tool in the future. 
What happened? 
What did you observe/feel/question about the experience?
Relate Make a connection between the issue/situation and your own personal skills, experience and understanding
Relate this to any relevant theoretical understandings
Have you experienced this before? 
What sense can you make of the situation based on what you already understand?
How does this situation relate to the theories in your course?
Reason Find an explanation for the situation/issue. Discover a relationship between theory and practice in order to seek a deep understanding of why something has happened
What significant factors impacted the situation/issue?
How do these relate to what you have previously experienced?
What evidence can you find in relevant theories to support your understanding of the events?
What impact do other perspectives have on the issue?
Reconstruct Draw a conclusion and discuss the improvements that could be made. Identify any changes or improvements for future planning. Apply your learning to other contexts and your future professional practice
Why did this situation/issue occur?
What theories support your rationale?
How would you deal with the situation next time?
What strategies would you develop for future practice based on what you now know? (It is a good practice to come back later and adjust your responses after you have used more tools)
 
 
Assessment Criteria
You will be assessed based on the following criteria: 
Criteria Explanation Weightage
Formulation of a design thinking approach to innovation  Develop and submit a problem statement and design criteria for the industry problem based on the data collected and insights derived from the design thinking methodologies used in this course 15%
Application of design thinking tools Using the template checklist provided, collate and annotate a portfolio of work demonstrating the use of design thinking tools to achieve the learning outcomes 50%
Critical evaluation The extent to which your overall submission incorporates a critical evaluation of the ways in which the design thinking methodologies and tools used in this course have helped you develop an understanding of design thinking principles and articulates the benefits and complexities with the use of design thinking for identifying and defining problems wherein innovation, in its various forms, might be required 25%
Teamwork The extent to which you have articulated the benefits of collaboration in a design thinking context and an application of the knowledge and skills to team foundations and a plan that outlines your commitment to team success 
References to the theories of team formation and planning for team success must be appropriately incorporated 10%
For a better understanding of evaluation criteria and marking structure, go through the Assessment Rubric given below.

Deliverables and Submission
Checklist and Artefacts: At the conclusion of the Module, you should have created the artefacts listed in the checklist attached below:
With the exception of the SWOB exercise (which relates to teamwork), your portfolio need not incorporate each of artefacts/evidence of each of the activities but must include the checklist and justify why each artefact is or is not included.
Annotated Portfolio: Ultimately the artefacts and the annotations that you incorporate will ‘tell the story’ of your journey to finalise a problem definition and a final version of your design brief. Please use the following guidelines/criteria to perform a sanity check for your portfolio before turning it in:
The collated materials will incorporate your annotations, which must fulfil the guidelines defined in the document attached above. You can use the following file as a guide to learn more about the structure of annotated portfolios:
Reflections on the Portfolio: You need to incorporate reflective practice so that your reader understands what you have learned from undertaking the activities and creating the artefacts. You can read more about reflective writing here.As you go about attempting the assignment, please keep the referencing guidelines in consideration.
Assessment Submission
The students have to check their report for similarity scores on Turnitin first before final submission. Please submit your similarity scores report generated by Turnitin in the below submission tab.
The instructions for using Turnitin to check similarity scores on the Deakin platform are listed in the document below:
As your graded submission for this course, submit your annotated portfolio and reflections as a zip file and follow the naming convention:  
Please use the following checklist in order to keep track of your portfolio and submit it along with your assignment
Included?Yes/No Artefact Justification for inclusion or exclusion
 

This Accounting Assignment has been solved by our Accounting Experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.
    
Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment Experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.